Web3.Js Vs Ethers.Js – Key Differences

Crypto and blockchain developers could capitalize on the value advantages of multiple programmable blockchain networks.

Source: 101 Blockchains

Ethereum emerged as one of the popular choices for facilitating smart contract programmability to create decentralized applications. As the demand for web3 development continues growing, debates such as web3.js vs Ethers.js have been gaining prominence for developers. It is more important than ever to identify JavaScript libraries which could help in deploying decentralized applications. At the same time, the need for deploying web3 applications across multiple blockchains also calls for selecting the ideal JavaScript libraries. The following discussion helps you find answers to “Which is better web3 JS or ethers JS?” with a detailed overview of each library. In addition, the side-by-side comparison of both libraries can help in finding out the ideal choice suited to your requirements.

Why Should You Compare Web3.js and Ethers.js?

The inception of web3 concepts has revised the traditional approaches for developing applications. Almost every web3 site or dApp uses libraries such as web3.js or ethers.js. The comparison between web3 libraries is an essential requirement for identifying the library which you can use. What are the libraries used for? The Ethereum JavaScript libraries could help developers interact with Ethereum or other EVM-supported blockchains through the JSON-RPC protocol. JavaScript libraries are useful for introducing various fundamental functionalities in a decentralized application. For example, the creation of wallets, smart contract deployments, blockchain querying and transaction signing. Developers can complete these actions without the necessity of raw API calls to the concerned blockchain.

The web3 vs ethers JS debate is a critical highlight for every web3 developer. Prior to any web3 development project, developers are likely to worry about the suitable choice of JavaScript library for their projects. Each library offers a compressed and reusable collection of code that could execute specific functions or a group of functions related closely to each other. Rather than writing a new code from scratch to add new functions, developers could add a library to the application and use it for implementing the desired function.

Imagine building a home as an analogy to building an application. Once you have developed the home, you will think of adding furniture to your interior décor. Would you work on building the furniture from scratch? The practical option would be to purchase the furniture you want for your home from a shop. The furniture store serves as a library where you can access your desired functions for the application, i.e., your home. Therefore, the differences between web3 libraries have been gaining prominent levels of attention in recent times, particularly among developers. When you know the functions served by each library, you can make the right choice for your concerned web3 application.

Differences between Web3.js and Ethers.js

The detailed description of the basics of web3.js and ethers.js offer an effective impression of how both of them serve useful value advantages to developers. However, it is important to find answers to “What is the difference between web3.js and ethers.js?” with side-by-side comparisons on the basis of different factors. Here is an outline of the different pointers which can offer you a viable comparison between web3.js vs ethers.js.

• Developers

The first thing one would notice in any project or technical solution before using it would refer to the identity of the founders. The identity of developers could offer a generalized glimpse of the library’s credibility. The difference between web3 libraries turns in favor of web3.js, which has the Ethereum Foundation as its founder. With the assurance of a complete organization or ecosystem behind the library, developers can explore multiple functionalities. On the other hand, ethers.js was created by Richard Moore as an alternative to web3.js.

• Popularity 

Web3.js is the popular choice in comparison to ethers.js. However, ethers.js has also been growing in terms of popularity and has accumulated a substantial user base in recent times. If you compare web3.js and ethers.js in terms of popularity, you will find that web3.js has more Github stars and forks. On the other hand, ethers.js has registered more weekly NPM downloads as compared to web3.js.

• Performance

The next important factor for finding the answers to “Which is better web3 JS or ethers JS?” would refer to performance. Ethers are a considerably lightweight library in comparison to web3.js, thereby guaranteeing the assurance of better performance. Ethers.js is only about 77 kb in the compressed form and 284 kb in the uncompressed form. At the same time, the web3.js library can take up space in the number of megabytes. However, the size factor comes into play for performance in the case of small dApps. Furthermore, the lack of adequate speed test data for the same apps with web3.js and ethers.js create doubts about the performance advantage.

• Maintenance 

The evaluation of the difference between web3.js and ethers.js in terms of maintenance also qualifies as another highlight for comparing the two libraries. Web3.js enjoys support directly from the Ethereum Foundation with active maintenance schedules by Chainsafe. With around 304 Github contributors alongside 4 collaborators on NPM, web3.js offers significant benefits for web3.js. On the other hand, ethers.js is under maintenance by an independent software engineer. As of now, it has only one NPM collaborator and around 15 Github contributors. However, the comparison between web3.js and ethers.js reflects on reviews and feedback from developers for identifying maintenance efficiency. Both the web3.js and ethers.js libraries go through regular updates to resolve bugs and adding new features.

• Documentation 

The facility of documentation is another highlight in the comparison between web3 libraries for identifying the ease of starting with the libraries. Each web3 JavaScript library has extensive documentation which can help you begin your journey with web3 development. On the other hand, ethers.js presents additional resources such as a guide for ‘Getting Started’ and the ‘playground.’

• Usability 

The usability of web3.js and ethers.js is also another important factor for comparing the two libraries. Web3.js works by combining wallets and node providers in a single object. On the contrary, ethers.js has two distinct entities for wallet and node providers. Therefore, ethers.js can offer the flexibility for separating the reading and modification of the blockchain state from the signing and maintenance of private keys. As a result, ethers.js can guarantee a better developer experience with the separation of wallets and providers. At the same time, web3.js is an ideal choice for beginners with the flexibility of learning from tutorials, support documents and web3 projects.